Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 15:18
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Uh-Oh! Switch 2's New GameChat Feature Is Transcribing Bad Words - Nintendo Life
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Marchand nets 2OT winner as Florida evens Finals - ESPN
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Leprosy Was Lurking in The Americas Long Before Colonization, Study Finds - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How can I get thousands of likes on TikTok?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Fed on Hold Leaves Wall Street Asking What It Will Take to Cut Interest Rates - Bloomberg.com